Title: Angelologia
Author: Danielle Trussoni
Publisher: World Books
Release Date: November 2010
Number of pages: 512
My tire:
Danielle Trussoni is an American writer, whose works were published in magazines such as The New York Times Magazine, Telegraph Magazine and The New York Times Book Review . "Angelologia" is her debut novel, and the right to issue this book have been sold to 25 countries. In addition, Columbia Pictures bought the film rights "for a million dollars. "Well, that ad should ensure (and maybe not necessarily?) good and engaging read.
Bringing the story is not my forte. I always fear that too much wypaplam. Or Not Enough . Although the latter is definitely better. Whatever. Returning to the book I'll just say that ... uh ... it tells about the struggle of nifilimami angelogów, a search conducted by the angelic artifact ever, about discovering the mysteries of the past, the separation of truth from the myth of seeking their own destiny. Yes This is precisely what this book is. More or less.
can now move on to the pros and cons of this novel. To begin with, what in the book I did not like, and it was the eternal "return to the past." This book is one large retrospective heroes. Shares in the present tense is as much as the mighty little. But wspominków so that as much as a headache. Heroes everywhere are remembering something that happened yesterday, a month, several months or several, several years ago. At some point, moving up to the year 925 or listen to stories from the time of the Flood. I'm not saying that such shifting back in time is bad. Quite the contrary. Some of the flashbacks were really interesting. Especially such a long, which began on page 153, and ended on page 295, and transfer it to us in 1999 to the time of World War II. Or the one in which the protagonist was in a point B and doing trivial thing, type C, to mention something at this time by a few good parties. Yes, a little kpię. Sorry. Simply This was for me far too much. Just as he was also too much speculation, Musing, thinking, thinking, complain, theorizing, pouring water and too much stuff going on in my head only heroes. Not for me such psychological topics. If you can even call it that. Sure you can. I will not argue.
As for the characters - what łooomatko orphans. Ok, so not quite write. I apologize once again. The heroes in my mind they were .. well ... the artificial and unreal. And their conduct in certain situations? Who so doing? Moreover, sometimes I had the impression that the characters appearing in this book have any problems with the assimilation of facts. And worse, the author thought that the reader has a tan same problem, so repeating something over and over, in every possible way. Yes, again picking up.
As for the characters - what łooomatko orphans. Ok, so not quite write. I apologize once again. The heroes in my mind they were .. well ... the artificial and unreal. And their conduct in certain situations? Who so doing? Moreover, sometimes I had the impression that the characters appearing in this book have any problems with the assimilation of facts. And worse, the author thought that the reader has a tan same problem, so repeating something over and over, in every possible way. Yes, again picking up.
Lest we could see the same "be and fe 'things, let us now for the pros. The idea for the story? Yes, the idea that this lady was good. All this angelologia, theology becomes intertwined with the myths, the vision world nifilimowie in power - in this place I applaud. I wondered all this, I admit. In addition, theme exploration, solving puzzles of the past, finding lost "treasures" like Indiana Jons - it's also I liked this book.
next item that deserves attention is the attention to detail and presentation of the idea of \u200b\u200bangels. The author has done a piece of good works and attempted to actually accurate descriptions of these celestial beings, including their anatomy, physiology, classification. Frankly, that all these were really intriguing question, and read about them with real curiosity.
Another plus. I, I think ... I think ... not. I have no idea and I give up, I will not find more pluses. Come back, I lied. Prince has a nice cover. [Yes, chuckling maliciously;)]
It's not that this book is bad. Has its own charm, and probably what I did not like find favor with other readers . Yet I also 'something' liked it. So if someone wants to read it, let them read. These numerous letters at the top combined into words, and these, in turn, believes it's just my loose thoughts, which can not yet agree.
Read: 14/01/2011 The
My Rating: 3.5 / 6
# # #
Z I apologize in advance for this składne very utterance. Probably not much I can still write about books that have not liked so much. Lack of enthusiasm and desire?
0 comments:
Post a Comment